Social Media Misuse and Digital Rights Violations During Uganda’s Political Campaign Season
By Timothy Mwanje – Director at High Intelligence | Kampala, Uganda
Uganda’s political campaign periods have increasingly become hotspots for online misinformation, harassment, and human rights and privacy violations, further amplified by the misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. While social media empowers citizens to share information rapidly, it has also fuelled a troubling trend of publicly exposing and accusing individuals without authorised verification or due process. This misuse of digital platforms has led to reputational harm, wrongful accusations, public intimidation, and widespread ethical concerns.
The
images widely circulated on social media platforms such as X/twitter, TikTok, and
Facebook illustrate how easily a person’s photo or video can be taken out of
context and used to create narratives that may provoke physical violence or mob
justice, bypassing lawful processes.
On 7th December 2025, a viral incident of an individual named Kankiriho Coleb was publicly
posted on social media as participating in acts of violence during a
presidential rally in Gulu City. Old photos and videos of him with colleagues
and family were retrieved from unrelated moments and reposted, exposing not
only him but also his family and associates to public threat. Alarmingly,
images of children were included in these posts on Facebook, putting minors at
risk and violating their rights.
However,
in a video response circulating online, Coleb clearly states that he is not
currently in Uganda, denies any involvement in the alleged acts, and clarifies
that he has no connection to the individual shown in the violent clips. Despite
his clarification, the first frame narrative had already spread widely,
exposing his children, family, and colleagues to scrutiny and violating their
privacy and human rights.
![]() |
| (screenshot) Kankiriho Coleb, in the video clip, responds to media accusations |
This
case reflects a growing pattern in Uganda’s digital space where:
Random, unrelated photos are attached to political
stories.
Unverified allegations are spread before facts are
checked.
Innocent individuals become targets of public outrage
and digital harassment.
Implications
of This Digital Misuse
Violation of Privacy and Digital Rights: Misusing
someone’s image without consent, especially to accuse them of wrongdoing, directly
violates their right to privacy, dignity, and protection from defamation or
public insult.
Irreversible Reputational Harm: Once misinformation
goes viral, correcting the narrative becomes extremely difficult. The affected
individual may suffer long-term personal, social, and professional
consequences.
Escalation of Political Tensions: During such campaign
periods, unverified claims and manipulated content can inflame political
divisions, provoke hostility, and even lead to physical violence. Social media
becomes a weapon of intimidation rather than a platform for civic engagement.
Psychological Impact: Being falsely accused or exposed
online can trigger trauma, anxiety, and emotional distress.
The
Government of Uganda, through the Ministry of ICT and National Guidance, the Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), and the National Information Technology Authority - Uganda (NITA-U), has consistently warned against the misuse of digital platforms, especially
during high-tension periods such as political campaigns, festive seasons, and public
gatherings.
Concluding
with: The misidentification incident highlighted in this case study underscores
a pressing challenge in Uganda’s digital ecosystem, the rapid spread of
unverified information that can cause real harm to innocent citizens.
As
political campaigns intensify, it becomes increasingly crucial for Ugandans to
prioritize truth, verification, and respect for human dignity before sharing or
reacting to online content.
A
safer digital environment begins with each user making responsible choices, choosing
verification over virality, and ethics over exaggeration.
Social
media users should never attempt to replace lawful investigative processes.
Authorities
should emphasize the need to:
Promote responsible digital citizenship.
Strengthen enforcement against online harassment.
Protect citizens from identity misuse, insult, and
cybercrime.
These calls highlight the importance of balancing freedom of expression with the protection of individual rights when using social media platforms.
![]() |
| Facebook, retrieved old photos with family |
![]() |
| Different faces attached to the accused |



Comments
Post a Comment